The High School Gymnasium :: Observation Essays, Descriptive Essays

My alarm clock blares into my silent room. Its time to spend the early on hours of my Saturday morning at the same place I pass the late hours of my Friday night. Groggily I get dressed and leave without breakfast. When I arrive, it is dark, empty and cold. The lonely olfactory perception replaces what was bright, full and warm just hours ago. This place is the gymnasium at my high school. For quaternion years, I withstand exerted sweat, tears, and even blood in this place. On this stage, four years of my growing up and maturing were played out for anyone willing to pay two dollars. I have been everywhere in this gym, from standing high on the bleachers with a birds eye view, to lying on the ground debating whether to rise only to get knocked down again. Those who have left a fail of themselves in this place can breathe deeply and inhale experiences. Experiences of glorious victories and experiences of embarrassing defeats both experiences I have left in that gym. Friendships w ere made and wooly-minded on that court, and other ones strengthened when my friends from outside came with their support and encouragement. It is here I learned perseverance, hard work, determination and loyalty. It is not here that I found who I was, but more who I was not. It is here I had to not settle for mediocrity, but strive for excellence. When I think back to the long hours I spent in this gymnasium, the most prominent memory will be my final game there. It was a night of emotions. I was surrounded by encouraging teammates, confirming family and friends, and finally I received my reward for the energy I had spent there for four years I made the game winning shot. small-arm my name will soon be taken down from the wall, and another person will wear number thirty-three in that gym, I have left a piece of me there, which is the beauty of the place.

Managerial Stakeholder Theory

Managerial Stakeholder Theory To predict real-life phenomena we need theories. Similarly, stakeholder surmise is a supposition which is used to explain the phenomena of motivation for merged social disclosures. This research exert is based on the fantasy of stakeholder system and its hardheaded applications in predicting the phenomena of bodily social disclosures (van der Laan 2009). Further thither will be explanation of Managerial stakeholder surmise. The concept of stakeholder possibility has got popularity among corporate world, managers, media and academics.Concept of Stakeholder management possible action is in truth much relate to business ethics and it has dominated the literary productions of business ethics. In doing business values become a necessary part of the boldness and stakeholder theory starts from this assumption. Stakeholder theory explains the behavior of managers towards their stakeholders and besides tells us how the managers want to do the busin ess. The theory also clears that what kind of relationship managers want with their stakeholders and what kind of relationship they should have (Aarhus School of blood 2004).There will also be a brief history of stakeholder theory and its role in explaining the motivation for corporate social disclosures. There be ii theories which are offered to describe the phenomena of motivation for the corporate social disclosures. First one is managerial stakeholder theory and another(prenominal) is legitimacy theory. Legitimacy theory is not our foreboding here as it advances that corporate social disclosures are unpaid in nature and are part of process of legitimating (Crane & vitamin A Ruebottom 2011).An article The role of theory in explaining motivation for corporate social disclosures voluntary disclosures v/s solicited disclosure from the journal Australasian accounting business and finance journal is considered to get along the assessment. The article is a good source of info rmation for the topic stakeholder theory as it is currently written. This is a highly reliable article as it is taken from the journal which is a journal of university of Sydney.The article covers on the whole the information which is required to complete this assessment. It explains the concept of corporate social disclosures in detail and how it is motivated by the theories like stakeholder theory and legitimacy theory. Accuracy of the article is excellent as it is easily accessible and contacting information of the author is also provided. The author is a highly renowned author in Australia and also is a faculty of economics and business in the University of Sydney (Colorado college community 2012).The phenomenon which is discussed in this work later is of motivation for corporate social disclosures. Corporate social disclosures are primarily voluntary in nature as it tells the stakeholders of an plaque about the internal information of the organization. Stakeholders are the consequential part of the organization and they should have the information about the organization. But today corporate social disclosures are not voluntary every time as there are companies which keep their stakeholder away from the information which can claim them.Stakeholders like NGOs, regulatory agencies, fund managers who are directly or indirectly associated with the organization are demanding the social information from the companies and thus increasing the social responsibilities of the companies (Crane & Ruebottom 2011). This is how the concept of solicited corporate social disclosure comes into existence. Due to this confusion roughly disclosure principles we have a big subject area of research. According to freeman the exposition of Stakeholder is any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organization. Shareholders also come under stakeholders group as they are the important part of the organization. Shareholders are also aff ected by the firms success or failure just like customers, suppliers, employees and local community. In general the idea of the stakeholder theory is about the conceptualization of the organization i. e. how an organization should be. Friedman has said that the organization itself should be thought of as grouping of stakeholders and the purpose of the organization should be to manage their interests, needs and viewpoints. A managers responsibility is to manage the corporation for the benefit of its stakeholder so that they can insure their rights and participation in decision reservation. caution of an organization is just like an gene for the stakeholders which ensures the excerption of the firm (Fontaine, Haarman & Schmid 2006). The definition of stakeholder and its relationship with management purpose of the organization and its behavior towards the stakeholders role of the managers towards the stakeholders these things have got changed over the time and are very confusing .For example the father of stakeholder theory Freeman himself changed the definition of stakeholder. In one of his latest publication he defines stakeholder as those groups who are vital to the success and survival of the corporation. In his other latest publication he states that The principle of stakeholder recourse. Stakeholder may bring an action against the directors for failure to perform the required duty of care. In all we can say that the concept of stakeholder theory needs to be studied thoroughly so that we can get a clear picture of the theory (Reed 1999).There are two entreees to the stakeholder theory first one is called as normative approach and the second one is known as descriptive approach. The principles and ideas which are explained higher up come under normative approach of Stakeholder Theory. Normative approach of stakeholder theory explains the behavior of managers and stakeholders towards organization i. e. how the managers and stakeholders should act an d what should be their view on the purpose of the organization.It is all based on some ethical principles. The descriptive approach of the stakeholder theory deals with the actual behavior of the managers and stakeholders towards the organization. This theory is concerned with managers and stakeholders i. e. how they actually view their actions and roles. There is another approach to the Stakeholder theory which is known as Instrumental stakeholder theory which is concerned about how the managers and stakeholders should behave if they want to work on their own interest.In some literature own interest is considered as the objective of the organization i. e. maximization of shareholders wealth and profit maximization of the organization. So in all we can say that broadly speaking there are three approaches to the managerial stakeholder theory first normative approach second descriptive approach and the third is Instrumental approach. As the concept of the Stakeholder theory has got p opular among organizations resultantly different definitions of the stakeholder has been growed. The question arises what is a Stakeholder?Stanford Research Institute (SRI) defines the stakeholder as those groups without whose support organization would cease to exist. This definition is given in the hold of Freeman. afterward this Freeman gave another definition of the Stakeholder that any group or individual who can affect or is affected by the achievement of the organizations objectives. After this Freeman continued to use these definitions in a modified form those groups who are vital to the survival and the success of the organizations. So, we can say that there is no a particular definition of stakeholder which is give birthed by the entire business community but yes, they use it according to their needs. Now when the definition of stakeholder is clear the other question comes in front of us and that is who the stakeholders are? We can classify the stakeholders in group of people who are associated with the organization. The main groups of stakeholders are Customers, Employees, Local Communities, Suppliers and Distributers and Shareholders. This classification of stakeholders is done by Friedman.He has also considered some other groups as stakeholders in addition, these groups are The media, the public in general, business partners, future generations, then(prenominal) generations (founders of the organization), academics, competitors, NGOs or activists, stakeholder representatives such as trade unions or trade associations of suppliers or distributors, financiers other than stockholders (debt holders, bond holders and creditors), government, regulators and policymakers. After the classification of the stakeholder there are some other sub classifications such as media will be categorized as Print media, Television, radio.Similarly, other classifications are having their sub categories and definitions (Fontaine, Haarman & Schmid 2006). If we cl ack about the history of the stakeholder theory, it came into existence in the mid of 1980. The person who gave this theory to the world is Richard Edward Freeman. The credit of the popularization of stakeholder concept goes to Freeman. The title of his work is Strategic Management and only the subtitle is A Stakeholder Approach and came out in 1984. The concept of stakeholder of Freeman was done on the perspective of company.He built on the process work of Ion Mitroff, Richard Mason, and James Emshoff. The word stakeholder came from research work in Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in 1960. After this the concept of stakeholder was heavily influenced by the planning department of the Lockheed caller-up and these ideas were developed from the researching done by Igor Ansoff and Robert Steward. Dodd said that GEC was already identifying four groups with whom they had to deal with. These four groups were shareholders, employees, customers and general public.After this in 1990s Johns on and Johnson added one more than group to this year and this group was of managers. Further the concept of stakeholder theory got modified by Friedman and is still on the way of modification. Theories and frameworks which were traditional were not efficient enough to help managers to develop new strategic directions. Freeman says that the old theories were not consistent with the quality and kind of change which were taking place in the environment of 1980s. In Freemans word it was not enough to solve the calls for increased productivity using the methods from Japan or Europe.According to Freeman, The emergence of new groups, events and issues which cannot be readily unsounded within the framework of an existing model or theory It makes us uncomfortable because it cannot be readily assimilated into the relatively more comfortable relationships with suppliers, owners, customers and employees It originates and the murky area labeled environment and affects our ability cope with i nternal changes. Freeman made his view of the firm as a common hub and managers were not mentioned in this hub as they work within the firm so they will automatically be included in the hub (Crane & Ruebottom 2011).The word Stakeholder was chosen by Freeman on the basis of the traditional word Stockholder. Stockholder is a word which takes only a look on the economic point of view but Stakeholder considers a group of people who can affect or can get affected by the achievement of the organizations objective. Means stakeholder is a broader bourn and stockholder is a narrower term which can come under stakeholder. Now we will be discussing Normative, Descriptive and Instrumental theories of stakeholder separately.The aim of normative approach of the stakeholder theory is to understand the moral or philosophical guidelines linked to the activities or the management of the corporations. In descriptive approach we consider the behavior of the managers towards the stakeholders, means how they deal with the stakeholders. On the other hand instrumental approach study the organizational consequences of taking into account stakeholders in management examining the connections between the practice of stakeholder management and the achievement of mingled corporate governance goals.Normative theory is the core of the stakeholder theory. It answers the questions like what are the responsibilities of the companies in respect of the stakeholders. And why should companies take care of others interests than the shareholders interests. Many authors accept that relationships between the firm and the stakeholders are based on the moral commitments and normative approach deals with the same. Freeman and Evan gave their normative theory based on the definition of stakeholder that those groups who are vital to the survival and success of the corporation. These groups involve customers, employees, suppliers, communities, shareholders and managers. Evan and Freeman proposed two p rinciples Principle of corporate legitimacy and the stakeholder fiduciary principle. The first principle says that the company should be managed for the benefits of its stakeholders and also stakeholders must participate in decision making. The second principle states that management must act as an agent of the stakeholders for the welfare of the stakeholders and to insure the survival of the firm. After this there were other principles developed by Freeman in normative approach e. g.The principle of entry and exit, the principle of governance, the principle of orthogonalities, the principle of contracting costs, the style principle and the principle of limited immortality (Fontaine, Haarman & Schmid 2006). Off course these principles are having their particular definitions. After normative approach if we discuss about analytical approach of the stakeholder theory then we must notice that it is the combination of instrumental and descriptive approach. This analytical approach w as proposed by Donaldson and Preston. The analytical theory answers the question how to organize into the pecking order stakeholders influence.Let us first discuss Freemans theory. He gave two definitions of the stakeholders Group of people who can affect or can be affected by the achievement of the organizations objective. Those groups who are vital to the survival of the organization. According to the Freeman it is necessary to understand who are those groups who can affect or can be affected by the achievement of the objectives of the firm? He said that each MNC should be clear about its stakeholder and for that he suggested interest questions Who are our current and potential stakeholders? What are their interests and rights?How does each stakeholder affect us? How do we affect each stakeholder? How do we keep score with our stakeholder? And many more questions are there in the list. Now when we talk about stakeholder theory and its practical application on corporate social disclosure principles then the theory of solicited corporate social disclosure comes into its existence. According to Gray, to place corporate social disclosures in a theoretical context, several broad, overlapping groups of theories concerning information flows between organizations and nightclub have been used. Theories which are social nd political in nature and deal with the flow of information from companies to the stakeholders are considered more take over for the explanation of corporate social disclosures (CSD). Development of the stakeholder theory and legitimacy theory is based on the political economy perspective. Even the perspectives for both the theories are same but there are big differences among them. Stakeholder theory is recognized when an organization has to deal with its stakeholders at micro level and legitimacy theory is applied at a conceptual level (Fontaine, Haarman & Schmid 2006).Donaldson & Preston stated that, Stakeholder theory has been advanc ed and justified on the basis of its descriptive accuracy, instrumental power and normative validity. These three aspects of theory, although relate are quite distinct. They involve different types of evidence and argument and have different implications. This research work is based on the descriptive aspect of the stakeholder theory because this is the only aspect of stakeholder theory which is applicable to the real world.Mitchell claims that stakeholder theory attempts to articulate a fundamental question in a systematic way which groups are stakeholders deserving or requiring management attention, and which are not? So, the descriptive approach of stakeholder theory clearly explains that who are the stakeholder accountable for the organization and in this way practical application of stakeholder theory is required to explain the phenomenon of motivation for corporate social disclosure.Stakeholder analysis requires the identification of the stakeholders who are in the need of information from the organization or we can say that who are the stakeholders having some right to have the information (van der Laan 2009). Also it clears that why these stakeholders require the information and others dont. While deciding the appropriate group of stakeholders to provide the information and the essential information CSDs results in conflict between stakeholders. There are no sufficient research works visible(prenominal) which can clarify the CSDs concept taking descriptive aspect of stakeholder theory into consideration.Social disclosures are used strategically to manage relationships with stakeholders by influencing the level of external demands originating from many different constituencies. Robert applied the framework of Ullmann and found Stakeholder power, Strategic posture and economic performance are significantly related to the levels of CSDs and which is used by organizational managers as a proactive method of managing stakeholders and their organizational environment. Thus we can say that the descriptive approach of managerial stakeholder theory provides a framework in which we analyze the CSD in a centered way.The only limitation of the theory is that it provides the information of organization to the stakeholders who are really in the need of it. References Ruebottom, T & Crane, A 2011, Stakeholder theory and social identity Rethinking stakeholder identification, J Bus Ethics, vol. 102, pp. 77-87. Laan, S 2009, The role of theory in explaining motivation for corporate social disclosure voluntary disclosure vs solicited disclosure, Australasian accounting business and finance journal, vol. , no. 4. Reed, D 1999, Stakeholder management theory a critical theory perspective, Accessed on 3 terrible 2012, http//www. yorku. ca/dreed/pdf/Stakeholder-Mgmt-Critical-Theory. pdf Fonatine, C, Haarman, A & Schmid, S 2006, The Stakeholder theory, Accessed on 3 high-minded 2012, http//www. yorku. ca/dreed/pdf/Stakeholder-Mgmt-Critical-Th eory. pdf Colorado community colleges 2012, five criteria for evaluating web pages, Viewed on 3 August 2012, http//www. ccconline. rg/Library_Resources/Evaluating_Sources/Five_Criteria Heath, J & Norman, W 2004, Stakeholder theory, corporate governance and public management, Journal of business ethics, vol. 53, pp. 247-265. Reynolds, S, Schultz, F & Hekman, D 2006, Stakeholder theory and managerial decision making constraints and implications of balancing stakeholder interests, Journal of business ethics, vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 285-301. Phillips, R, Freeman, R, & Wicks, A 2003, what stakeholder theory is not, Business ethics quarterly, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 479-502.

Egt Task

Although the current Managers atomic number 18 fluent in Korean, it will be important to hire local dialect persons to add to our staff. This will ensure acceptance, communications, and in each case preventing miss spoken words that me be taken as offensive If non done with the proper tone. Curriculum Instructor certification. Since South Korea converted the KIT- Korea teak Escalation In 1954 Into the World Teakwood Federation, the feeling In Korea Is all Black Belts must hold certificates from the WTFO.This may be Just a financial contrivance to collect money room those outside Korea, however the perception exists that if you hold a certificate (called a Okinawa Certificate) you are then legitimate regardless of what hoidenish you received the certificate, since all Okinawa certificates originate in Seoul, South Korea. All staff who do not currently hold their given Black Belt aim must be certified by the WTFO prior to submitting an application to be an instructor in our Ko rea Dugong expansion plans. Since no Okinawa officers exist in the fall in States, all certifications will be done by Head sea captain Ken Adulated, 6th Degree Black Belt Okinawa holder.Country of Origin of retail goods. triple primary countries manufacture martial arts apparel (uniforms) and sparring gear. These are Japan, China, and South Korea. While Americans are primarily obsessed by legal injury, and seem to swerve country of orally pride, Korea Is the opposite. It will be critical that all uniforms, belts, and sparring gear ONLY herald from South Korea manufacturing companies. To offer anything else is potentially offensive, but should these goods come from China or Japan, it would also be a disgrace since both countries attacked Korea in the last century. B. ProductThe product of Americas Best Teakwood is martial arts lessons. In America, most adults will not allow themselves to stick with a program, and many areas of the program we currently offer need to accommodate the lack of focus for mature students, and their ability to Justify quitting. Only 1 of 10 Americans (compared to 1 out of 4 Europeans) has attempted to learn martial arts. Of those 33 million, only 10% squelch with It beyond 30 days, leaving 3. 3 million. Of those 3. 3 million only 10% will stay with It another 3-6 months quitting Jest as they prepare to discharge out of novice level.Of the enameling 330,000 who achieve Green belt/beginner Intermediate, only 10% of those will reach beginner advanced, or Brown Belt. We are odd with just 33,000 Brown belts, In the USA, all but 10% quit after Just 30 days at Black belt, higher than any other country in the world. About 330 people are left who continue actual Black belt training, only 10% of those achieve Master level in the USA, Just 33 out of 330 million. Moving into Korea, we must modify our program for the long term goals of students.Parents will require their children answer, and they will attend with them, it will be a Emily event, training multiple days per week for 6-10 years or more. It will be important to modify our tuition timeline to not appear to be short sighted Americas with no ling term vision, or they may feel we are looking for short term profit, or will not stay through difficult times. The good news is that Korea has been losing the Gold typewriter ribbons at the majestics to other countries and is accepting of Americas teaching teakwood and they have ardent respect for the Lopez family of Houston Texas, multiple Gold Medal winners.We will leverage our affiliation with the Amateur Athletic Union with Coach Lopez. We will use this for credibility but not for promoting an American Agency. 82. Price Tuition pricing in America is structured around making it easy to quit, monthly pricing is not as important as not needing to make any commitment. In Korea it will be the opposite. Students will not mind signing non cancel agreements paid in full for 6 years as long as the rates are fair. For Korea the pricing will be a base of $900. 00 per year, for 4 classes per week, 2 hours per class, we expect class sizes to be 50-150 per class.In America our current pricing is $200. 0 per month, month to month, 2 classes per week, 50 minutes per class. Koreans will look at price per hour over the long term, wanting the most hours per week at the lowest rate with a long term commitment Americas want to recognize how cheaply they can Join, and how easily they can quit, more like leasing a car. 83 Promotion In America martial arts lessons are promoted in a disposable product manner, viewed like a 6 pack of Coke. Coupon driven society demands a call to action for a discount.Teachers are held in higher regards in Korea and it would be a disgrace to offer discounts, promotions, or marketing fluff. The Koreans will want endorsements from martial arts organizations and to see community service done by the staff. When they see us in public, they will approach us, but the Koreans will be completely turned off if the go to corner market and see one month of lessons and a free uniform for 19. 99.. Word of mouth and grassroots promotion only in Korea. BE Place 52 million people actively practice Tea Swoon Do globally it is the most popular martial art.Korea in the past has not been accepting of foreign companies opening Dugongs in Korea, but the loss of first place in the last 3 Olympics has changed this. The OIC, International Olympic Committee has removed Baseball, Hockey, and Wrestling as of late. Talk is they will remove Karate, Judo, or Tea Swoon DO. Koreans national sport is Tea Swoon Do, and they are promising more support and resources. They will do whatever it takes to keep this Olympic Sport status. Allowing Americas Best, a proven Junior Olympic Gold Medal winning organization into Korea and supporting its grassroots movement is a given.C Ethical Issues to us from Korea. The Koreans have warned us that Americans are viewed as fat, lazy, and abrasive. The exa mple proven to us is Korean infant adoption, only for America do they have a height and weight scale/range for adopting parents from America. 2) Where the money goes.. Alt has also been brought to our caution from the WTFO that Koreans will need to see a direct line for their tuition to returning to the community. Unlike Americans who will buy a Toyota or Honda and not intercommunicate where the money goes, the Koreans will need to see proof that some of it stays in the community. Sources None.

Complexometric Determination of Water Hardness Essay

AbstractUsing complexometric method of calculating water hardness, an EDTA closure was made and calculated to be around .00209M. This EDTA solution was whence used to titrate a water sample with unknow hardness. The sample used was sample 18. The hardness of the sample was calculated to be 180505 ppm. This is within prevalent levels for the Mesa area.IntroductionThis experiment focuses on titration with EDTA. Titration is the determination of a given component in solution by addition of a liquid reagent of known strength until the endpoint is reached when the component has been consumed by reaction with the reagent. An indicator called Eriochrome Black T will enable detection when the EDTA has completely chelated the metal impurities. Chelation happens when a ligand (with more than one binding site) forms a complex with a metal ion. Ligands are complexes that form when the electron donating groups form coordinate covalent bonds through alter orbitals on the metal ion. This experi ment contains Ammonium chloride buffer which is an inhalation irritant.ProcedureAbout 500 mL of approximately 0.004 M disodium EDTA solution needed. The solution should pee-pee between 0.70.8 g of Na2EDTA and dissolve in most 500mL deionized water in a plastic bottle. The bottled is Sealed and shaken vigorously for a few minutes to dissolve the salt. Standardize the Na2EDTA solution using a stock calcium ion solution as the primary standard. Using a 10-mL impartation pipet to add 10.00 mL of standardized calcium ion stock solution (1.000 g CaCO3/L solution) to a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask which will have an additional 30 ml of deionized water to this titration flask. Adding a magnetic stir-bar the solution was thence stirred. about 3 mL of ammonia/ ammonium ion chloride buffer is added to the solution. Just prior to titrating the flask, adding quadruplet drops of Eriochrome Black T indicator solution will be needed.At the endpoint, the color will change from pink to violet to blue. This will repeat cardinal more times. Then Choose one prepared foreign water sample as provided. Record the unknown code in a notebook, then titrate this water sample with your standardized disodium EDTA solution. Transferring 25.00 mL of the prepared water sample to a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask will be done. Then Add about 20 ml of DI water to the titration flask, which will have a magnetic stir-bar. The solution will have an added portion of 3 mL of ammonia/ammonium chloride buffer. The solution will then change color as previously examined in the depression portion. This procedure will be repeated twice more.Results and newsEDTA solutionInitial Reading (mL)(mL) delivered0.0mL50.01mL0.0mL47.05mL0.0mL46.10mLThe average of the mL delivered of the three results is 47.72 mL The Molarity of the EDTA solution was calculated and is shown below.Ppt 15.99 for 50.01 mL deliveredPpt 4.68 for 47.05 mL deliveredPpt 11.31 for 46.10 mL deliveredUnknown solutionInitial Reading(mL)(mL) delivered 0.0mL22.9mL0.0mL21.41mL0.0mL20.41mLThe average of the mL delivered of the three results is 21.57 The hardness of the unknown water sample was calculated using the Molarity of the EDTA solution standardized in the first portion of the lab. The calculation is shown below. Ppt 20.55 for 22.9 mL deliveredPpt 2.47 for 21.41 mL deliveredPpt 17.92 for 20.41 mL deliveredThe tables reveal a difference in (mL) delivered in comparing the first experiment to the unknown. The unknown must have a weaker tolerance to the indicator in which the first experiment is stronger.ConclusionThe water hardness in Mesa ranges from 12 gpg (grains per gallon) to 22 gpg (1). The Ppt of the unknown and EDTA do and dont fall within Mesas range. There are some numbers that fall within the range and at that place are some that may fall out. Overall the data has some proof that the water hardness of the EDTA and unknown can potential match up to Mesas.Sources(1) http//www.mesaaz.gov/water/hard_water.aspx

CW Introduction

The founder of eyelid was by a man named Dieter Schwartz who currently has a net worth of around $15. 2 cardinal he got that success from being the founder of Lid. He is the CEO and chairman of the company and Dieter is also the CEO of the hyper market Kaufmann. The company Lid has been around for numerous years and they were founded in the year 1 930 when the company was founded in Ger umpteen. The first ever Lid store was opened in the year 1973 and the store started to pass on a lot of consumers by the sasss.Lid then decided to branch their stores outside of Germany and as of now the store can be found in about every country in Europe. Lid loves to sell top quality products and sell them for the lowest prices available. The first ever UK store of Lid was established in 1 994 and they are still growing in the UK and more than 600 stores. 1 An evaluation of the strategic position of the company (500 600 words*) There are many different ways that Lid are trying to keep their st rategic position of the company. This will allow the many plans that Lid has for true plans and development.Which include plans such as there expansions? There have been reports that to maintain Lids strategic position is by expanding the amount of stores they have and they soon want to have an empire of 1 500 stores and this will maintain their strategic position as more stores and thus this will mean more business. I will also include a SOOT analysis of Lid which show the strengths of the company and show the strengths and weakness of the company. Strengths in Lid include Has a good range of brand products and also has its own Bargain labelsThey usually build their places in deprived areas where cheap food and items are needed by that area and they sell items that causal agent most of peoples incomes Lid usually open on Sundays and holidays Is going to expand their store count to 1500 stores Weakness in Lid They are still beauteous small compared to bigger brands There isnt ma ny chain stores around Opportunity To gain a further stronghold and to expand in other countries bid Africa and Asia Threats The increase in competition with Laid and other business meaning more intention for Lid Cost of all products PESTLE analysis for Lid an PESTLE analysis evaluates the following areas of Lid which include the following Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal and Environmental. Political The political areas that can affect Lid are as follows the governance intervening with wages and having Lid have National Minimal wages.

Going After Cacciato

Waking up from the American Dream in Going after warfared Cacciato (Tim OBrien) What passing-bells for these who die as cattle? Only the monstrous angriness of the guns. Only the stuttering rifles rapid rattle Can patter out their hasty orisons. (from Anthem for Doomed Youth, Wilfred Owen) Sassoons epitaph All Soldiers are hallucinationers at the beginning of the novel functions as a signpost signaling the shape the novel will take. It does not merely deal with brutal horror, it is imagination. Reality and dream, fact and imagination are interwoven.The prime(a) of Siegfried Sassoon suggests the undischarged War, the English experience of war, which can be compared to the American Vietnam experience, for it had the same impact total disorientation and national trauma because of lost values. This novel thus deals, in story and expression, with the war experience, and also with the US societys influence on that war through the ordinary soldier. The common grunt raised the heads pring how to act properly in this horrible situation, in which he even did not know whether his presence was morally justified or not.Yet he think that, although he knew this war was just as insane as any other war, he should not run away from his duty. He stayed in the war, because of his ain obligations to society. Not out of idealism, but merely because his spate expected him to. In novels dealing with Vietnam we often see veterans coming back into the American society (like in Caputos Indian Country), but here we are confronted with the country itself. The novel Going after Cacciato deals with the journey to Paris an American soldier fantasizes about.It is November 1968 and Spec. Four Paul Berlin is in his observation tower in Quang Ngai, Vietnam, by the South China Sea, performing his tour of duty, which lasts 365 days for the common grunt, the foot soldier he is. He feels he has come to Nam in another way than soldiers had gone to the Second World War and to Korea. His lieu tenant, Lt Corson had been in Korea, and he was looking back to it with nostalgia In Korea, by God, the people liked us. Know what I mean? They liked us. Respect, thats what it was. And it was a decent war ( The troubles this Nobody likes nobody. (p. 134) New were the blindness of war, the inertia, drugs were taking over, the creation of the new watchword fragging, i. e. killing a superiour officer It all illustrated this war was supposed to be contrasting from those wars in which Paul Berlins ancestors had fought, with in their mind the American dream. However, Vietnam was not different at all. Soldiers who enthousiastically started their subtracticipation in Vietnam, were as quickly traumatized by the killings, as any other soldiers. A war like any other war.Stories that began and knap without transition. No developing drama or tension or direction. No order. (p. 255) When Paul realizes this, the main question for him is how to determine his own drift in it. As he does not k now an anwer, the possibility, or rather the necessity of dreaming something else in the face of horror, is brought to Vietnam. He starts to think about Cacciato. This bloke fishes in the worlds Great Lake Country where ein truthbody says on that point is no fish. He dutifully goes through all the motions and all of a sudden het gets out, and Paul is intrigued.Pauls squad is sent to go after Cacciato. They are following the unmarked character and find him more and more almost a holy character, less defined as they go along. Finding him a friendly leader almost, they follow him. From soldier among soldiers, he develops into a friendly symbolical figure pointing the way. The seductiveness of Cacciato leads them on. He sheds his war implements. He is that annoying, different, seperate shot who bounces the ball, who nobody can trace and think of, who does not really exist, he has not even got a first nameCacciato, that just fulfills. Going after Cacciato means going after a dream, fol lowing that dream, but it can also mean going after to actually get that dream. Time and time again there is this ambiguity of going on the hunt after Cacciato, or following the Italian on desertion there is the choice between reality and dream for Paul. Cacciato, who nobody has actually seen, has hit upon an idea which his indeterminance made possible, and it speaks to the imagination. Paul goes after him, catches him, thus completing his mission, but lets Cacciato escape.Cacciato hence leads them through the beautiful high country, through orderly Mandalay, normal Delhi, to a beheading in gruesome Tehran, all the way via Athens to Paris the switch of scenery symbolizes the hope Paul first feels, gradually turning into despair and total confusion. His experiences on the way show Paul that he cannot actually cave in the war behind. Cant get away from it, Doc mumbled. You try, you run like hell, but you just cant get away. Its the truth. (p. 178) Arrived in Paris and having hugg ed, outbursts of rain and thunder presage the outgoing difficulties.Reality soon makes the squad go and hunt down Cacciato again. Oscar, the streetwise Detroit black, insists on the Real Politik of getting Cacciato to save their own skins from punishment for desertion. They have to arrest Cacciato and discard their dream, because society expects them to do so. Oscars right, Doc said, and sighed. You cant get away with this shit. the realities always cath you. But maybe. No maybes. Reality doesnt work that way. (p. 275) Paul Berlin is not ready yet to stop Cacciato and lets him escape again. Choosing reality and turning his back on the dream are, however, close at hand.In the promotion scene Paul remembered himself solvinging questions to a committee that scare the living daylights out of him. Why do we fight the war? they asked him, but at the same time the committee told him the answer to win. Very afraid, he repeated this and got the job. Paul then realizes society urges h im to do as he is told, and not to think for himself, as society will do that for him. He has to correct and shut up. He knows this cannot be right, but on the other hand his fantasized run for Paris would have been an equally unhappy experience to him in reality.For ideate it had been all along. His dream of going after the exculpatedom and peace Cacciato led him to, had all been a dream within a dream. The latter dream was dreamt in order to avoid having to solve the dilemma of staying in or running away from the war. He finally woke up from that dream, for now he had found the answer he had to go through it trying to escape and fleeing from social obligations was not according to his background, his personality and his beliefs. I fear what might be thought of me by those I love. I fear the loss of their respect.I fear the loss of my own reputation. Reputation, as read in the eyes of my father and mother, the people in my hometown, my friends. I fear being an outcast. (p. 286) The novel is structured round three elements that are in accordance with the three different activities of Paul Berlins conscience reflection, imagination and memories he is wondering how people die in the war, he thinks about going to Paris and he stands on guard. The killings of war and their stories are told non-chronologically, as if they happen at this very moment.Paul Berlin tries to get things straight, tries to get a chronological list of the men killed. He needs order, wants to keep it straight, but he has problems with this. The structure of the novel reflects the structure of any war it is confusing and without order, sometimes a mess and going in different directions. The hero solves this problem by making up a story himself. It is a story in the third person, told as a reality, told almost as observed by an omniscient observer, who has no involvement but at the same time we know they are Paul Berlins imaginations.All of a sudden this woman comes up in the he-country of Vietnam only in imagination a beautiful girl is possible there. By the end of the novel the reader knows that the squad never went after Cacciato any further than the hill, and that Paris only denoted the invocation of seeking the Far west. In reality they had always been in the Far East. The unlimited possiblities of the Imagination, as that of the United States and its American Dream as well, fail in the reality of the Vietnam War.Berlin, whose name points to the American commitment to saveguard freedom (by setting up the airbridge to the city of Berlin under siege of the Soviets in 1948) finds himself in a situation in which the values, ideals and intentions of the United States no longer have the absolute meaning they seemed to have in previous wars. In Paris, the heart of Western civilization, Paul Berlin lacked the courage to free himself, even in his dreams, and reality took over No question, it was all crazy from the start. None of the roads led to Paris. p. 203) He has t o accept that he and his comrades would be the very deserters, who would flee from the original idea of the American Dream, that told them that the only way if you really wanted to overcome all problems is to keep on trying. Only Cacciato, who with his childish comfort and innocence, with his optimism and his individual power embodies the mythical American loner, he frees himself from the society that tells him what to do. He is, however, lost, together with these values, in the Vietnam War.The American Dream had led young Americans into a place where they had no right to go. They were supposed to fight and defeat the Viet Cong to serve the American nation, but in this war, just like in any other, confusion and decease were the real victors the war served no American purpose at all. The lesson Paul learned from the Vietnam War was far from significant Don never get shot. on that point it is, said Eddie Lazzutti. Never. Don never get shot. (p. 254) He might have learned that back home in the US as well.So in Vietnam this trail West was a fake one. In Fort Dodge you could build good solid houses, in the wilds of Wisconsin you fraternized with your father who told you, back there, to look for positive things in the war. In Nam, however, there is only the squad, and all of a sudden this boom, like in Billy Boy Watkins story, the case of the grunt dying of fright. It is the ultimate war story, the story of Vietnam. So Paul starts dreaming his own dream, he rejects the American dream. He nevertheless does not reject reality.Like Arthur Dimmesdale in The Scarlet Letter by Nathanial Hawthorne, he does not want to give in to the code of society, but does not want to be lured into the moral wilderness either. He wants to stay part of that society, although he knows its claims are based on air. it is this social power, the threat of social consequences, that stops me from making a full and complete break. (p. 286) However nasty the war may be, it is better to take p art than to be isolated, so Paul Berlin ends his dream, in order to face reality. bibliography Going after Cacciato (Tim OBrien) Walking Point American Narratives of Vietnam (Thomas Myers)

Krakauer’s life Essay

In April of 1992 a new(a) man named Chris McCandless, from a prosperous and loving family, hitchhiked across the country to Alaska. He gave $25,000 of his savings to charity, left his railway car and nearly all(a) of his possessions. He burned all the cash he had in his wallet, and cre ingestd a new keep. Four months later, his body was found in an bedraggled bus. Jon Krakauer constructed a journalistic account of McCandlesss story. Bordering on obsession, Krakauer looks for the clues to the mystery that is Chris McCandless. What he finds is the intense pull of the wilderness on our imagination, the appeal of high-risk activities to young work force.When McCandlesss mistakes turn aside to be fatal he is dismissed for his naivet. He was said by some to have a death wish, besides wanting to die and wanting to see what one is capable of are too very different things. I began to ask myself if Chris really wasnt as half-baked as some sight thought. Then I realized it was quite pos sible that the reason people thought he was crazy was because he had died toilsome to fulfill his dream. If he had walked onward from his adventure like Krakauer, people would have praised him rather than ridicule. So I asked the question, How does Krakauers life parallel Chris McCandlesses?Chris and Jons life have many parallels and contrasts at the same time. Both gave up most of their possessions to go after a dream they had. Ones dream was to live off the field in the remote regions of Alaska, the other too climb the Devils Thumb, a mountain peak that had never been scaled by man. Each man was aware of the risks, merely were they equally prepared when each began their own adventure? I feel that Chris McCandless was at a disadvantage when he first started off. Raised by a wealthy family and just graduating from Emory University I feel he wasnt as prepared as he could have been.Fortunately his father had taken him on hiking trips so he was at least somewhat familiar with the w ilderness but in no way was he prepared at all for the severity of the Alaskan wilderness. I think it would have been quite a feat just for Chris to have been able to live off the land in a local forest. To be fair to Chris Im sure Krakauer didnt start off by just one day deciding he would climb the Devils Thumb after he was inspired by making it up the climbing wall at the local county fair. Both men had to gradually work their way up to accomplishing their goals. Jon did this bymany other smaller climbs and Chris worked his way up by studying nature books and roaming across the U.S. So in this way Jon and Chris were alike even though their goals were different.Another way the two were similar was the fact that they both(prenominal) had family problems. Though his parents and sister loved him Chris secretly despised his parents for covering up the fact that his father had been raising two separate families. Just like Chriss father Lewis Krakauer had already begun to prepare him fo r a career that he didnt want to be any part of. I think both sons were consumed by a sort of blind insaneness when they found out that their fathers were less than perfect. This anger fueled them to rebel and go against their fathers wishes to make their own futures.The biggest (and most obvious) difference between Jon and Chris is that one died living out his dream and the other lived to walk away from it. Most people would say that Chris failed because his goal was to survive in the wilderness. Others would say that Jon succeeded because he made it too the outstrip and lived to tell his tale. However were the incidents really that different? Chris lived in the Alaskan wilderness almost a hundred days before his fateful mistake that follow him his life. Jon also had a few fateful mistakes that could have cost him his life but didnt, like the time he caught his tent on fire or when his supply plane couldnt come because of bad weather.Most people wouldnt even dream of doing eithe r of these feats. When the risks are as high as either of these men confront, even the most simple of mistakes can prove fatal. I think that if Chris was seen as a failure then so should Jon. I think this because Jons original goal was to climb the unclimbed section of The Devils Thumb. When Jon could not accomplish this he backtracked and found an easier, already climbed path. However I think that both men were successful in their own ways. Chris survived for an extended period of time without the help of civilization but due to the poisonous potato seeds he ate he was too weak to hike back to civilization. Jon realized his limitations and knew he was forced to lower his goal or face death. If anyone was a failure it was Jon because he backed down from his initial goal.Ever since I was a small boy I have been an outdoorsman. I love to go camping and go on hikes. At summer camp I would climb the rock piles and go exploring. I can relate to both Jon and Chriss desire for adventure. Even here at college I continue to love the outdoors. I use the climbing tower at the ARC, go snowboarding on the sledding hill, and go running on ROTC trails (during warm weather). But even though I love the outdoors I still dont have what it takes to do what either of these men tried to do. I know my limitations and wouldnt want to risk my life foolishly. I know its possible that I could learn how to but unfortunately all my life I have been taught that someday Ill go to college, get a good job, get married, have kids and live a happy, uneventful life.Which is why I admire Jon and Chris, both had the courage to go against the norm of society and just go do what they felt like. Dont get me wrong I love my life but some days I wish I could do what they did, just throw away all my possessions and worries and just do what I really want to do. Bob Marshal put it best when he said For me, and for thousands with similar inclinations, the most classical passion of life is the overpowerin g desire to escape periodically from the clutches of a mechanistic civilization. To us the enjoyment of solitude, complete independence, and the beauty of undefiled panoramas is dead essential to happiness (Outdoorclub).Ever since man began to explore we have had a desire to conquer and know the unknown. In the days of the Wild West young men would move their families westward in search of adventure and opportunity the wild ones, the men of the wild frontier (Wayne 1). This drive, this manifest destiny, the great pressure of people moving always to new frontiers, in search of new lands, new power, the full freedom of a virgin world, has ruled our course and formed our polices lake a Fate, (Weinberg 1) is what compelled Jon and Chris to go against the grain of society and follow their dreams. With fewer and fewer New Frontiers these two were forced to resort to one of the last unconquered regions of the world, Alaska. It was there that they faced their fears and overcame hardships t o succeed.In conclusion I think that one of the reasons Krakauer decided to write astir(predicate) Chris McCandless is the fact that he found so many disturbing coincidencesabout his own life that he felt obligated to tell Chriss story. I think it is quite possible Jon feels guilty about having survived when Chris died. Either way, I think both men were success full even though they both had very different goals and outcomes.Works CitedOutdoorclub. 01 Mar. 2005.Wayne, Bennett. Men of the Wild Frontier. Champaign Garrard makeCompany, 1968.Weinberg, Albert. manifest Destiny. Baltimore Johns Hopkins Press, 1935.