The Vinland Map :: History Papers

The Vinland Map is believed to predate Christopher Columbus expedition by almost 50 eld as it has realistic cartography of the island of Vinland, thought to be a exposit of Canada or even Northeastern America. The function could potentially provide evidence that the Scandinavian explorers were the first Europeans to visit America and map it. However, there is doubt surrounding the origins and age of the map. These issues have divided scientists into two groups devoted to proving the authenticity or pretermit thereof of the map. Recent research has use several chemical analyses which have examined specifically the paper and the ink present on the map. The most recent methods used to test the map have been carbon dating and Raman spectroscopy. It is thought that the map was written on paper which has origins in pre-Columbus days. However, several analyses of the ink have revealed the aim of anatase, a form of TiO 2, which was non developed until the first part of the 20 th Centur y. This clearly would contradict the evidence that the paper is authentic. However, these two claims do not necessarily contradict one another.A recent theory is that the parchment was recovered from an earlier work and then a forger used sophisticated ink to draw a fake map. Carbon-14 dating has put the origins of the parchment to the mid 1400s. It is very hard to come to a definitive conclusion from the acquirable evidence as both sides offer strong arguments. In my own opinion, the map is more likely authentic than a forgery. However, the controversy surrounding the map has not yet been settled. The Vinland Map has been at the center of controversy ever since it appeared around 1957. It depicts several islands in the Atlantic Ocean, but more importantly, an island called Vinland. This island is believed to be part of Canada or even Northeastern America. If the map is truly genuine, then it pre-dates Columbus discovery of America by more than 50 years (Gorman, 2002). However, th ere has been never-ending doubt surrounding its origins and authenticity. These issues have divided scientists into two camps which seem to ride circles around one another. As soon as new evidence arises, psyche disputes it with counterarguments that are just as strong. The controversy has focused most recently on two issues the ink used to draw the map, and the parchment that it is drawn upon.